Prophetic Preface
By Prophet Jacob R.
Blandford
When comparing the preface of the
AV 1611 it is obvious that the King James translators had much more faith and
integrity than their modern counterparts.
They also had the reformers’ zeal and courage; which again wanes in
these contemporary times among the Laodicean scholars. But there is another outstanding element to
the translators’ preface: it was prophetic. Look at the very first sentence of the AV
preface, (which is titled ‘The Translators to the Reader’:)
it reads, “The best things have been
calumniated”. To ‘calumniate’ means
‘to utter maliciously false statements’.
There has been no other book on the face of this green earth that’s been
attacked or ‘calumniated’ more than the King James Bible! In fact, this prophecy was specifically
fulfilled in another preface—the
preface of the New Revised Standard Version of 1989. These modern apostate junkies are so whacked
out on the antichrist spirit and ecumenicism that Bruce Metzger, who wrote the
preface, wrote in it: “In the course of time, the King James
Version came to be regarded as “the Authorized Version.” With good reason it
has been termed “the noblest monument of English prose,” and it has entered, as
no other book has, into the making of the personal character and the public institutions
of the English-speaking people. We owe
to it an incalculable debt. YET THE KING JAMES VERSION HAS SERIOUS
DEFECTS.’
And there it is, the devil himself couldn’t have raised more doubt about the true word of God than when he said to Eve, “Yea, hath God said...?” (Gen. 3:1)
Apostle Jude also prophesied of these men in Jude 10.
I’ll quote again from the
‘Translators to the Reader’ to show you how Laodicean Bible corrupters are
caught with their pants down—“Truly, good
Christian Reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to
make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one, (for then the
imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that
our people had been fed with gall of Dragons instead of wine, with whey instead
of milk): but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one
principal good one, not justly to be
excepted against; that hath been our endeavor, that our mark.”
The AV 1611 is not justly to be excepted against because it is the AUTHORIZED Version, and it has borne more fruit and salvations than any other translation in the world. It is also not to be justly excepted against because it is theologically superior to the Alexandrian versions and a FAR more Christological Bible (teaching the Deity of Jesus Christ). I may be a ‘dumb Southerner’ but my common sense just tells me that if you’re a CHRISTIAN YOU SHOULD HAVE A CHRISTOLOGICAL BIBLE TEXT.
Also Dr. Miles Smith told you in the Epistle Dedicatory (with the the good hand of the Holy Ghost upon him) that “there should be [only] one more exact Translation of the holy Scriptures into the English Tongue”. I included the word “only” because it is “ONLY” as in KJV ONLYism or at the Protestant Reformation known as “SOLA Scriptura”.
If these so-called ‘bibles’ are correct and the AV is wrong, then why does Satan have his religious henchmen and ‘Christian’ emissaries constantly attack, ‘correct’, and revise it! Remember 2 Timothy 3:12.
Consider the following quotation from ‘Final Authority’ by Dr. William Grady, page 277: ‘The contemporary translations as a group have one thing in common: they tend to agree against the KJV... in omitting hundreds of words, phrases, and verses.’
Satan’s ‘Christian’ super-church (the RCC) won’t even allow its members to read a KJV—and it put all of Erasmus’ works (including his Greek Textus Receptus of 1516) on their forbidden list at the council of Trent (1545-1563). IF the RSV or NRSV was the true word of God the pope wouldn’t be friendly to it! He’d do like he did to Wycliffe (had his body exhumed and his bones burnt) or Tyndale (had him strangled and burnt at the stake). Because historically, the pope has NEVER been friendly to the true word of God; and never will be. The RCC has always, throughout this church age, persecuted true believers and their pure Texts.
Thirty communists were on the NCCC’s committee that produced the RSV! And after reading a few of Westcott and Hort’s quotations it is EASY to see these men were HERETICKS & INFIDELS! Most of the modern versions come from unbelievers, or apostate Christians that approach the Bible the same way an atheist would.
Remember, the religious ancestors
of the modern apostate scholars (the Pharisees) thought Jesus Christ was a
devil and that He did His miracles by the devil's power (see Matthew 12; Mark
3; Luke 11). The Pharisees thought the
Word Incarnate was a devil: is it any wonder modern scholars like Bruce Metzger
also slander God's written word (AV 1611) as defective? Talk about mistaken identities! I don’t know of anything you can be more
wrong about than saying the Good Lord and His Good Book are bad!
But back to the NRSV preface... Metzger slandering the 1611 in 1989 is the perfect example of what Samuel Gipp called in his ‘Understandable History of the Bible’ book: the “Model T” analogy (see pages 275-276).
The ERV of 1881 made 36,191 changes to the AV. (See ‘Final Authority’ page 262.)
One of the worst and most obvious errors in the Alexandrian versions is Mark 1:2. But ONLY in the King James can you get the correct reading. (See ‘Final Authority’ page 291.) The reading of Proverbs 17:8 in the NRSV is an example of its depravity and occultism.
People who defend and commend the
Alexandrian versions and Alexandrian manuscripts take for granted that there is
a devil out there that is 100% against the word of God because he knows it is
the greatest source of light and blessing, and he wants nothing but
curses. And they take for granted that
the great Apostle Paul said that even in the first century before the New
Testament canon was complete, Satan’s henchmen were already corrupting the word
of God (see 2 Cor. 2:17) and he the mystery of
iniquity was already working (see 2 Thess. 2:7). Plus, Apostle John said the antichrist spirit
was already in world (see 1 John